<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 231 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386747</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition on the ground of low tax effect. The operative point is that the matter was not entertained further because the revenue effect did not justify continued litigation, leaving the dismissal to rest solely on the tax-effect threshold reflected in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 231 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386747</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition on the ground of low tax effect. The operative point is that the matter was not entertained further because the revenue effect did not justify continued litigation, leaving the dismissal to rest solely on the tax-effect threshold reflected in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>