https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386734 A claim to absolute ownership over property held in joint names was not entertained because the plaint did not specifically plead that the consideration came from the plaintiff's known sources of income, which was necessary to invoke the statutory exception under the Benami law. The court noted that the admitted joint title and absence of an averment on relevant income could not be cured by evidence at that stage, so the declaration relief failed in its present form; however, the suit could proceed on injunctive relief, and interim restraint was granted. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386734 A claim to absolute ownership over property held in joint names was not entertained because the plaint did not specifically plead that the consideration came from the plaintiff's known sources of income, which was necessary to invoke the statutory exception under the Benami law. The court noted that the admitted joint title and absence of an averment on relevant income could not be cured by evidence at that stage, so the declaration relief failed in its present form; however, the suit could proceed on injunctive relief, and interim restraint was granted. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386734