https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386733 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a Kerala Government company facing financial crisis due to delayed excise duty payment. Relying on precedents declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing full duty payment by the appellant. The decision underscored adherence to legal principles established in previous judgments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386733 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a Kerala Government company facing financial crisis due to delayed excise duty payment. Relying on precedents declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing full duty payment by the appellant. The decision underscored adherence to legal principles established in previous judgments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386733