<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax, classifying services provided by M/s Raviraj Tours and Travels Ltd as &#039;rent-a-cab service&#039;. Emphasizing the purpose of vehicle hire and consideration, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing precedents that highlighted the significance of these factors in determining tax liability for such services. By following the reasoning from previous judgments, including re Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corpn and re Rahul Travels, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, distinguishing it from prior decisions like re Anil Kumar Agnihotri based on agreement nature and vehicle control.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax, classifying services provided by M/s Raviraj Tours and Travels Ltd as &#039;rent-a-cab service&#039;. Emphasizing the purpose of vehicle hire and consideration, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing precedents that highlighted the significance of these factors in determining tax liability for such services. By following the reasoning from previous judgments, including re Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corpn and re Rahul Travels, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, distinguishing it from prior decisions like re Anil Kumar Agnihotri based on agreement nature and vehicle control.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>