<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 212 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by remanding it to the adjudicating authority for further consideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to determine the place of removal and assess the eligibility of credit on GTA service, taking into account the circular issued by the Board and a specific decision of the Tribunal in a related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 212 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by remanding it to the adjudicating authority for further consideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to determine the place of removal and assess the eligibility of credit on GTA service, taking into account the circular issued by the Board and a specific decision of the Tribunal in a related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>