<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring that of the Assessing Officer. It emphasized the importance of a liberal interpretation of incentive provisions like section 80HHC and highlighted the statutory option of filing a revised return under section 139(5) to rectify claimed deductions. The Tribunal acknowledged the validity of creating additional reserves in subsequent years to meet statutory requirements and rejected the CIT(A)&#039;s strict interpretation of the second proviso to section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring that of the Assessing Officer. It emphasized the importance of a liberal interpretation of incentive provisions like section 80HHC and highlighted the statutory option of filing a revised return under section 139(5) to rectify claimed deductions. The Tribunal acknowledged the validity of creating additional reserves in subsequent years to meet statutory requirements and rejected the CIT(A)&#039;s strict interpretation of the second proviso to section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>