<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1638 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283681</link>
    <description>Section 7 insolvency applications require proof of financial debt and default, with limitation governed by section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Limitation Act. The claim was treated as enforcement of mortgage-secured debt under Article 62, and the petition was found within time. Objections based on uncertified account statements and the debt assignment were rejected because the bank records were sufficient and the assignment was treated as valid. The tribunal also held that pendency of the Joint Lenders&#039; Forum did not affect admission, found financial debt and default established, and admitted the petition, commencing CIRP and appointing an interim resolution professional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2019 11:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1638 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283681</link>
      <description>Section 7 insolvency applications require proof of financial debt and default, with limitation governed by section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Limitation Act. The claim was treated as enforcement of mortgage-secured debt under Article 62, and the petition was found within time. Objections based on uncertified account statements and the debt assignment were rejected because the bank records were sufficient and the assignment was treated as valid. The tribunal also held that pendency of the Joint Lenders&#039; Forum did not affect admission, found financial debt and default established, and admitted the petition, commencing CIRP and appointing an interim resolution professional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>