<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386718</link>
    <description>The court condoned the appellant&#039;s 287-day delay in re-filing the appeal, leading to the disposal of the application. The appeal contested the deletion of M/s Basiz Fund Services Private Limited from comparable enterprises for the assessment year 2009-10 due to functional dissimilarity, as identified by the DRP and upheld by the Tribunal. The court found no question of law, dismissing the appeal based on concurrent factual findings on enterprises&#039; functional dissimilarity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2019 08:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386718</link>
      <description>The court condoned the appellant&#039;s 287-day delay in re-filing the appeal, leading to the disposal of the application. The appeal contested the deletion of M/s Basiz Fund Services Private Limited from comparable enterprises for the assessment year 2009-10 due to functional dissimilarity, as identified by the DRP and upheld by the Tribunal. The court found no question of law, dismissing the appeal based on concurrent factual findings on enterprises&#039; functional dissimilarity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>