<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 193 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notices issued under section 271(1)(c) to be invalid for not specifying the specific charge, leading to the deletion of penalties for all three years. Penalties related to the disallowance of excessive lease rent payments were upheld, while penalties related to personal expenditure disallowances were deleted. As a result, the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 193 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notices issued under section 271(1)(c) to be invalid for not specifying the specific charge, leading to the deletion of penalties for all three years. Penalties related to the disallowance of excessive lease rent payments were upheld, while penalties related to personal expenditure disallowances were deleted. As a result, the appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>