<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 167 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for the normal period, set aside the demand invoking the extended period of limitation, and remanded the case back to the Original Authority for quantification of the demand for the normal period along with interest. Penalties under Rule 15 (1) &amp;amp; (2) of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11AC of CEA, 1944 were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 07:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 167 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for the normal period, set aside the demand invoking the extended period of limitation, and remanded the case back to the Original Authority for quantification of the demand for the normal period along with interest. Penalties under Rule 15 (1) &amp;amp; (2) of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11AC of CEA, 1944 were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>