<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386679</link>
    <description>Entitlement to refund of education cess and higher education cess paid under Notification No. 56/02 was treated as settled by the Apex Court, which held that such refund could be claimed under the notification. Applying that binding precedent, the impugned orders were found unsustainable and the refund claim was maintained in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 07:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386679</link>
      <description>Entitlement to refund of education cess and higher education cess paid under Notification No. 56/02 was treated as settled by the Apex Court, which held that such refund could be claimed under the notification. Applying that binding precedent, the impugned orders were found unsustainable and the refund claim was maintained in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>