<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1637 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283665</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the protective addition in the hands of the individual regarding the Rs. 3 Crores cash found at the airport, as the substantive addition in the company&#039;s hands was confirmed. The ITAT also allowed deductions for eligible flats in the Manasarovar Heights project but upheld the disallowance for Sai Sagar Heights under Section 80-IB(10). Additionally, the ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for cash payments due to dishonored cheques, deleting the disallowance under Section 40A(3). The ITAT further upheld the deletion of the addition made on account of 10% of direct and indirect expenditure and the determination of income from house property based on previous ITAT orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 06:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1637 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283665</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the protective addition in the hands of the individual regarding the Rs. 3 Crores cash found at the airport, as the substantive addition in the company&#039;s hands was confirmed. The ITAT also allowed deductions for eligible flats in the Manasarovar Heights project but upheld the disallowance for Sai Sagar Heights under Section 80-IB(10). Additionally, the ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for cash payments due to dishonored cheques, deleting the disallowance under Section 40A(3). The ITAT further upheld the deletion of the addition made on account of 10% of direct and indirect expenditure and the determination of income from house property based on previous ITAT orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>