<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 822 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283649</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions in an appeal regarding disallowance of detention charges, commission expenditure, and treatment of profit from the sale of shares for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the detention charges under section 37(1) as contractual, not penal, expenses. It also upheld the commission expenditure as genuine business expenditure and directed the treatment of short-term gains from shares as capital gains based on investment intent. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 822 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283649</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions in an appeal regarding disallowance of detention charges, commission expenditure, and treatment of profit from the sale of shares for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the detention charges under section 37(1) as contractual, not penal, expenses. It also upheld the commission expenditure as genuine business expenditure and directed the treatment of short-term gains from shares as capital gains based on investment intent. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>