<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19977</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the interest forgone by the assessee should be considered in calculating the perquisite value of the flat. As a result, the assessed value of the flat was reduced, indicating that no additional benefit was derived by the assessee. The court emphasized the significance of relevant factors in assessing perquisite values and concluded that there would be no order as to costs in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19977</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the interest forgone by the assessee should be considered in calculating the perquisite value of the flat. As a result, the assessed value of the flat was reduced, indicating that no additional benefit was derived by the assessee. The court emphasized the significance of relevant factors in assessing perquisite values and concluded that there would be no order as to costs in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>