<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 149 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386665</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 8 lakhs towards the purchase of a flat in Hyderabad, based on incriminating documents found during the search and the lack of evidence linking the cash payment to the garage sale proceeds. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; orders and dismissed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 11:45:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 149 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386665</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 8 lakhs towards the purchase of a flat in Hyderabad, based on incriminating documents found during the search and the lack of evidence linking the cash payment to the garage sale proceeds. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; orders and dismissed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>