<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386664</link>
    <description>The Revenue challenged the treatment of business income as capital gains, while the assessee disputed the classification of gains on share disposal. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to accept the claim of charging short term capital gain. The issue of disallowance of expenses on STT paid was remanded to the AO for further consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386664</link>
      <description>The Revenue challenged the treatment of business income as capital gains, while the assessee disputed the classification of gains on share disposal. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to accept the claim of charging short term capital gain. The issue of disallowance of expenses on STT paid was remanded to the AO for further consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>