<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 144 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the disallowance of commission expenses for two agents was not justified as the assessee provided unrebutted evidence and the AO failed to summon the agents using powers under Section 131. The additions made on account of these agents were directed to be deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 144 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the disallowance of commission expenses for two agents was not justified as the assessee provided unrebutted evidence and the AO failed to summon the agents using powers under Section 131. The additions made on account of these agents were directed to be deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>