<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 137 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal held that the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Act was not legally sustainable as the liabilities in question did not represent any expense or allowance claimed earlier by the assessee. Therefore, the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 11:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 137 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal held that the addition made under Section 41(1) of the Act was not legally sustainable as the liabilities in question did not represent any expense or allowance claimed earlier by the assessee. Therefore, the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>