<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reversing the disallowance under section 35(2AB) for scientific research expenditure and directing the AO to allow higher depreciation. The disallowance under section 14A was remitted for verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s directions on fresh claims and deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 11:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reversing the disallowance under section 35(2AB) for scientific research expenditure and directing the AO to allow higher depreciation. The disallowance under section 14A was remitted for verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s directions on fresh claims and deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>