https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386630 Where seized food goods are reported by laboratory material to be damaged, insect-infested, and non-compliant with food safety standards, the writ court will not ordinarily interfere with the seizure or compel provisional release while investigation into origin and legality remains pending. The court accepted that provisional release may be refused where the goods do not satisfy statutory compliance requirements under applicable law, and held that no ground was made out on the present record for unconditional release. The challenge to seizure and the request for release were therefore rejected, leaving the matter to the authorities. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:13:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386630 Where seized food goods are reported by laboratory material to be damaged, insect-infested, and non-compliant with food safety standards, the writ court will not ordinarily interfere with the seizure or compel provisional release while investigation into origin and legality remains pending. The court accepted that provisional release may be refused where the goods do not satisfy statutory compliance requirements under applicable law, and held that no ground was made out on the present record for unconditional release. The challenge to seizure and the request for release were therefore rejected, leaving the matter to the authorities. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386630