<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 111 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386627</link>
    <description>Rule 7 requires service of a show cause notice by personal delivery, registered post to the last known residence or place of business, and only then, if those methods fail, by affixation. Service by direct affixation without showing prior effective attempts was held invalid, and available email correspondence supported the need for electronic service where permitted. Because the notice was not duly served, the noticee was denied an opportunity to reply, breaching natural justice and Article 14. The ex parte penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after proper service and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:11:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 111 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386627</link>
      <description>Rule 7 requires service of a show cause notice by personal delivery, registered post to the last known residence or place of business, and only then, if those methods fail, by affixation. Service by direct affixation without showing prior effective attempts was held invalid, and available email correspondence supported the need for electronic service where permitted. Because the notice was not duly served, the noticee was denied an opportunity to reply, breaching natural justice and Article 14. The ex parte penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after proper service and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>