<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1697 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283639</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the case for detailed examination and inclusion in the Regular List for further proceedings. The issues of separate benchmarking of Royalty and Sales Commission payments and the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenditure without proper reference to comparables and the benefit test were to be thoroughly reviewed during the subsequent hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1697 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283639</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the case for detailed examination and inclusion in the Regular List for further proceedings. The issues of separate benchmarking of Royalty and Sales Commission payments and the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenditure without proper reference to comparables and the benefit test were to be thoroughly reviewed during the subsequent hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>