<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 37 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19967</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s exercise of powers under section 263, finding it valid. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on this issue. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the relief granted by the Income-tax Officer regarding gratuity deduction, in compliance with the Act. The Court determined that the admissible amount for gratuity deduction should be calculated based on specific criteria, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue as well. Ultimately, all three issues were decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 37 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19967</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s exercise of powers under section 263, finding it valid. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on this issue. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the relief granted by the Income-tax Officer regarding gratuity deduction, in compliance with the Act. The Court determined that the admissible amount for gratuity deduction should be calculated based on specific criteria, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue as well. Ultimately, all three issues were decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>