<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 995 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283627</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal regarding the adjustment made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled that the Assessing Officer was not justified in reducing profits for deduction under section 80HHC by deduction admissible under section 32A. The Tribunal concluded that section 143(1)(a) cannot be invoked, and the Assessing Officer should proceed with regular assessment under section 143(2)/(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 995 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283627</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal regarding the adjustment made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled that the Assessing Officer was not justified in reducing profits for deduction under section 80HHC by deduction admissible under section 32A. The Tribunal concluded that section 143(1)(a) cannot be invoked, and the Assessing Officer should proceed with regular assessment under section 143(2)/(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>