<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 90 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386606</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2007-08 and AY 2006-07, combining them due to similar issues. The case involved assessing the value of a land plot for wealth tax. The Tribunal granted relief to the assessee, considering the enjoyment and concession related to the disputed property. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow deductions accordingly, acknowledging the title to the property despite the ongoing dispute. The decision was rendered on 5th September 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 90 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386606</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2007-08 and AY 2006-07, combining them due to similar issues. The case involved assessing the value of a land plot for wealth tax. The Tribunal granted relief to the assessee, considering the enjoyment and concession related to the disputed property. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow deductions accordingly, acknowledging the title to the property despite the ongoing dispute. The decision was rendered on 5th September 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>