https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386603 The court set aside the challenged order under Section 251(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the second respondent did not independently exercise discretion but directed the petitioner to file a stay petition. The court remitted the matter for reconsideration and disposal of stay petitions within two months, granting a stay of coercive steps for ten weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Oct 2019 19:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386603 The court set aside the challenged order under Section 251(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the second respondent did not independently exercise discretion but directed the petitioner to file a stay petition. The court remitted the matter for reconsideration and disposal of stay petitions within two months, granting a stay of coercive steps for ten weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386603