<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 83 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386599</link>
    <description>The court allowed the tax case appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2009-10. It held that the appellant was entitled to claim under Section 80IB based on the interpretation of the term &quot;manufacture&quot; for tax benefits under Section 80HH. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of meeting specific criteria for claiming tax benefits under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 83 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386599</link>
      <description>The court allowed the tax case appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2009-10. It held that the appellant was entitled to claim under Section 80IB based on the interpretation of the term &quot;manufacture&quot; for tax benefits under Section 80HH. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of meeting specific criteria for claiming tax benefits under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>