<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386585</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal for AY 2013-14, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) and the revision of the written down value of assets for depreciation purposes. The decision aligned with past judicial rulings and the principle of consistency, referencing relevant case law and rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 07:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386585</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal for AY 2013-14, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) and the revision of the written down value of assets for depreciation purposes. The decision aligned with past judicial rulings and the principle of consistency, referencing relevant case law and rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>