https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283594 Article 142 relief cannot be used to bypass the statutory cooling-off period for mutual consent divorce, because complete justice powers remain exceptional and cannot override substantive statutory requirements. Where a party seeks immediate dissolution without special circumstances, discretionary intervention is not warranted. Parallel pursuit of identical matrimonial relief in different proceedings may also amount to abuse of process, and that conduct can disentitle a litigant to equitable relief. On these principles, the petition was rejected and no waiver of the waiting period was granted. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283594 Article 142 relief cannot be used to bypass the statutory cooling-off period for mutual consent divorce, because complete justice powers remain exceptional and cannot override substantive statutory requirements. Where a party seeks immediate dissolution without special circumstances, discretionary intervention is not warranted. Parallel pursuit of identical matrimonial relief in different proceedings may also amount to abuse of process, and that conduct can disentitle a litigant to equitable relief. On these principles, the petition was rejected and no waiver of the waiting period was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283594