<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283585</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the case after condoning the delay, despite the respondent lacking representation. Key names mentioned include Mr. G.E. Vahanvati and Ms. Rashmi Malhotra for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283585</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the case after condoning the delay, despite the respondent lacking representation. Key names mentioned include Mr. G.E. Vahanvati and Ms. Rashmi Malhotra for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>