https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386530 The appeal challenged the Commissioner(Appeals) order partly allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the demand of CENVAT credit of Rs. 2,62,616 along with interest and proportionate penalty. The remaining portion of the Order-in-Original imposing penalty was upheld. The Hon'ble Member found the imposition of penalty unsustainable in law, setting it aside and allowing the appeal of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of determining duty liability before imposing penalties and upheld relevant precedents in support of setting aside the penalty. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386530 The appeal challenged the Commissioner(Appeals) order partly allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the demand of CENVAT credit of Rs. 2,62,616 along with interest and proportionate penalty. The remaining portion of the Order-in-Original imposing penalty was upheld. The Hon'ble Member found the imposition of penalty unsustainable in law, setting it aside and allowing the appeal of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of determining duty liability before imposing penalties and upheld relevant precedents in support of setting aside the penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386530