<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the re-export of goods and approved the drawback claim within the statutory time limit, ruling in favor of the exporters. The decision resolved concerns regarding the identity of the re-exported goods, compliance with statutory requirements under Section 74, and the time limit for filing drawback shipping bills and re-exporting goods. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, directing the authorities to grant the drawback accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the re-export of goods and approved the drawback claim within the statutory time limit, ruling in favor of the exporters. The decision resolved concerns regarding the identity of the re-exported goods, compliance with statutory requirements under Section 74, and the time limit for filing drawback shipping bills and re-exporting goods. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, directing the authorities to grant the drawback accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>