<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19931</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of the loss against the profit from non-speculative business. The court held that the canceled transaction did not qualify as a speculative transaction under section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the court answered question No. 2 in the affirmative, granting relief to the assessee. The first question was deemed unnecessary due to the findings on the second question, remaining unanswered. The reference was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19931</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of the loss against the profit from non-speculative business. The court held that the canceled transaction did not qualify as a speculative transaction under section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the court answered question No. 2 in the affirmative, granting relief to the assessee. The first question was deemed unnecessary due to the findings on the second question, remaining unanswered. The reference was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>