<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386516</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders made by the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals), and the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with jurisdictional parameters regarding the reopening of assessment. The court did not address the second issue regarding the computation of chargeable expenditure, as the first issue was resolved in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386516</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders made by the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals), and the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with jurisdictional parameters regarding the reopening of assessment. The court did not address the second issue regarding the computation of chargeable expenditure, as the first issue was resolved in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>