<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 288 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, condoned the delay in filing Form No. 11A, and directed the Income Tax Officer to consider the form on its merits. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the credibility of the explanation for the delay and a less stringent interpretation of procedural requirements compared to previous standards. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a more lenient approach post-amendment of the relevant section and the binding nature of CBDT Circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 288 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, condoned the delay in filing Form No. 11A, and directed the Income Tax Officer to consider the form on its merits. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the credibility of the explanation for the delay and a less stringent interpretation of procedural requirements compared to previous standards. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a more lenient approach post-amendment of the relevant section and the binding nature of CBDT Circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>