<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 701 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283570</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of section 147 of the Income-tax Act. The court held that reassessment cannot be solely based on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the reassessment under section 147 was deemed improper. The court did not address the issue of deductions under sections 80-HH and 80-I due to the favorable ruling on the reassessment issue. The appeal was dismissed, with the court ruling against the appellant (revenue) and in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 701 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283570</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of section 147 of the Income-tax Act. The court held that reassessment cannot be solely based on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the reassessment under section 147 was deemed improper. The court did not address the issue of deductions under sections 80-HH and 80-I due to the favorable ruling on the reassessment issue. The appeal was dismissed, with the court ruling against the appellant (revenue) and in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>