<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1789 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283563</link>
    <description>The tribunal considered explanations for delays in filing appeals, upheld the deletion of disallowances under various sections, remitted some issues back for reconsideration, and followed precedents in allowing certain deductions and expenditures. The tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on legal precedents and judicial consistency, with specific directions provided for each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1789 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283563</link>
      <description>The tribunal considered explanations for delays in filing appeals, upheld the deletion of disallowances under various sections, remitted some issues back for reconsideration, and followed precedents in allowing certain deductions and expenditures. The tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on legal precedents and judicial consistency, with specific directions provided for each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>