https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283559 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on the issue of jurisdiction, finding the Assessing Officer's violation of the mandatory four-week period directive rendered the assessment order bad in law. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue's appeal regarding addition of bogus purchases was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures and timelines in reassessment proceedings, highlighting the significance of following High Court directives and principles of natural justice in assessments. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Oct 2019 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283559 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on the issue of jurisdiction, finding the Assessing Officer's violation of the mandatory four-week period directive rendered the assessment order bad in law. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue's appeal regarding addition of bogus purchases was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures and timelines in reassessment proceedings, highlighting the significance of following High Court directives and principles of natural justice in assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283559