https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283560 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing appeals on several grounds. It deleted the Transfer Pricing adjustment on AMP expenses, citing past ITAT rulings. The Tribunal permitted depreciation on the building despite its non-utilization, following precedent. It allowed payments to doctors, differentiating MCI guidelines, and directed the AO to grant depreciation on non-compete fees. Certain grounds were deemed academic due to the favorable outcomes on related issues. The order was pronounced in favor of the appellant, aligning with established legal precedents. en-us Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283560 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing appeals on several grounds. It deleted the Transfer Pricing adjustment on AMP expenses, citing past ITAT rulings. The Tribunal permitted depreciation on the building despite its non-utilization, following precedent. It allowed payments to doctors, differentiating MCI guidelines, and directed the AO to grant depreciation on non-compete fees. Certain grounds were deemed academic due to the favorable outcomes on related issues. The order was pronounced in favor of the appellant, aligning with established legal precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283560