<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1244 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386476</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed writ petitions challenging summons issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged GST evasion, citing the petitioners&#039; failure to request additional time from the respondent before filing the petitions. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting administrative remedies before seeking judicial intervention and upheld the principle of allowing administrative bodies to address grievances before court interference. The petitioners were granted liberty to approach the respondent for more time if needed, with no costs imposed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1244 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386476</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed writ petitions challenging summons issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged GST evasion, citing the petitioners&#039; failure to request additional time from the respondent before filing the petitions. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting administrative remedies before seeking judicial intervention and upheld the principle of allowing administrative bodies to address grievances before court interference. The petitioners were granted liberty to approach the respondent for more time if needed, with no costs imposed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>