<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 10 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19912</link>
    <description>Retirement of a partner from a firm was held to be only a readjustment of rights in the partnership assets between the retiring and continuing partners. Because there was no relinquishment or transfer of property, the retirement did not amount to a gift, and no gift-tax was chargeable. The Court also followed its earlier view that no goodwill capable of being gifted arose in such a transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 10 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19912</link>
      <description>Retirement of a partner from a firm was held to be only a readjustment of rights in the partnership assets between the retiring and continuing partners. Because there was no relinquishment or transfer of property, the retirement did not amount to a gift, and no gift-tax was chargeable. The Court also followed its earlier view that no goodwill capable of being gifted arose in such a transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>