<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1228 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting all additions made by the AO. It emphasized the importance of examining expenses item-wise and the need to reject books of accounts before making ad hoc disallowances. The decision highlighted that genuine business transactions should not be disallowed under Section 40A(3) if made due to bona fide business exigencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1228 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting all additions made by the AO. It emphasized the importance of examining expenses item-wise and the need to reject books of accounts before making ad hoc disallowances. The decision highlighted that genuine business transactions should not be disallowed under Section 40A(3) if made due to bona fide business exigencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>