<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1218 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386450</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the exclusion of a 35-day delay in appointing a Resolution Professional and an 18-day pendency period of applications, totaling 53 days, from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process timeline. This decision was based on established principles and previous precedents, ensuring efficiency within the prescribed time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1218 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386450</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the exclusion of a 35-day delay in appointing a Resolution Professional and an 18-day pendency period of applications, totaling 53 days, from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process timeline. This decision was based on established principles and previous precedents, ensuring efficiency within the prescribed time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>