<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19902</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of a firm of advocates, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s applications. It found that the firm&#039;s cash system of accounting, where money received from clients was credited to clients&#039; accounts, did not aim to reduce income. The Court emphasized the fiduciary nature of the advocate-client relationship and accepted the method as consistent with Bar Council rules. Additionally, it determined that the firm acted as a trustee for clients&#039; money, leading to the deletion of additions to the firm&#039;s income and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s request to refer questions to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19902</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of a firm of advocates, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s applications. It found that the firm&#039;s cash system of accounting, where money received from clients was credited to clients&#039; accounts, did not aim to reduce income. The Court emphasized the fiduciary nature of the advocate-client relationship and accepted the method as consistent with Bar Council rules. Additionally, it determined that the firm acted as a trustee for clients&#039; money, leading to the deletion of additions to the firm&#039;s income and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s request to refer questions to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>