<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MISTAKE IN E1 FORM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115463</link>
    <description>E1 form irregularity during a VAT/CST assessment where an E1 form included two extra bills beyond three genuine LR sale bills. The E1 mechanism was later replaced by the Bill to/Ship to concept under IGST, but the relevant period is pre GST. Only the genuine three bills supported by C forms and CST returns should be recognized; the taxpayer should furnish the party ledger and supporting records to the assessing authority to substantiate correct entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:51:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MISTAKE IN E1 FORM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115463</link>
      <description>E1 form irregularity during a VAT/CST assessment where an E1 form included two extra bills beyond three genuine LR sale bills. The E1 mechanism was later replaced by the Bill to/Ship to concept under IGST, but the relevant period is pre GST. Only the genuine three bills supported by C forms and CST returns should be recognized; the taxpayer should furnish the party ledger and supporting records to the assessing authority to substantiate correct entries.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:51:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>