https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386417 The court quashed the impugned order under section 130 of the GST Acts, directing the release of the conveyance and goods. It found the confiscation decision lacking proper application of mind and reasons, emphasizing the necessity of justifying such actions. The court highlighted the importance of recording reasons for such orders to ensure fairness and transparency, referencing the Supreme Court's precedent in Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. v. Masood Ahmed Khan. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386417 The court quashed the impugned order under section 130 of the GST Acts, directing the release of the conveyance and goods. It found the confiscation decision lacking proper application of mind and reasons, emphasizing the necessity of justifying such actions. The court highlighted the importance of recording reasons for such orders to ensure fairness and transparency, referencing the Supreme Court's precedent in Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. v. Masood Ahmed Khan. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386417