<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1180 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386412</link>
    <description>The tribunal deleted all additions made by the authorities in the case. The addition of Rs. 4 crores for alleged bogus premium was removed due to lack of cross-examination and evidence. The Rs. 18,05,87,658/- addition for unaccounted land investment was deleted as it relied on an unsupported document. The Rs. 17,85,79,435/- addition for on money receipts was also deleted based on a prior judgment in favor of the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1180 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386412</link>
      <description>The tribunal deleted all additions made by the authorities in the case. The addition of Rs. 4 crores for alleged bogus premium was removed due to lack of cross-examination and evidence. The Rs. 18,05,87,658/- addition for unaccounted land investment was deleted as it relied on an unsupported document. The Rs. 17,85,79,435/- addition for on money receipts was also deleted based on a prior judgment in favor of the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>