<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1170 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the claim that the transactions did not involve cash. The Tribunal emphasized the decision in Jatia Investment Co., which held that Section 68 does not apply to non-cash transactions. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1170 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the claim that the transactions did not involve cash. The Tribunal emphasized the decision in Jatia Investment Co., which held that Section 68 does not apply to non-cash transactions. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>