<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386400</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order dated 08.08.2019 due to the lack of specific reasons and findings. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent to pass a speaking order on merits and in accordance with the law within four weeks. The court reiterated that an order must stand or fall based on the reasons stated therein and not on subsequent pleadings or counter-affidavits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386400</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order dated 08.08.2019 due to the lack of specific reasons and findings. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent to pass a speaking order on merits and in accordance with the law within four weeks. The court reiterated that an order must stand or fall based on the reasons stated therein and not on subsequent pleadings or counter-affidavits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>