https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386398 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing interest payment at 6% per annum on the principal amount from November 2003 to May 2004. The court found no evidence of coercion or undue influence in the deposit process, rejecting the petitioner's claim for interest from March/May 1998. The refund application for the principal amount and interest was made in December 2003, and the refund, including interest, was paid in May 2004. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386398 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing interest payment at 6% per annum on the principal amount from November 2003 to May 2004. The court found no evidence of coercion or undue influence in the deposit process, rejecting the petitioner's claim for interest from March/May 1998. The refund application for the principal amount and interest was made in December 2003, and the refund, including interest, was paid in May 2004. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386398